Skip to Main Content
Welcome to the Marketplace

Go to Main Navigation

Myasthenia Gravis: Causes, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Treatment and Current/Future Research

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. It affects the neuromuscular junction, where nerve signals are transmitted to muscles, leading to impaired communication and muscle weakness. This blog aims to provide a comprehensive overview of MG, including its causes, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment and current/future research directions.


The underlying cause of Myasthenia Gravis is the production of autoantibodies that target components of the neuromuscular junction, primarily the acetylcholine receptors (AChR) or, less commonly, the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK). The production of these autoantibodies is thought to result from a breakdown in immune tolerance, leading to an abnormal immune response against self-antigens.

The exact triggers for this immune dysregulation in MG are not fully understood, but it is believed to involve a complex interplay between genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. Genetic factors play a role, as certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes, such as HLA-B8 and HLA-DR3, have been associated with increased MG risk (Farmakidis et al., 2012). However, these genetic factors alone do not explain the development of MG, suggesting the involvement of additional environmental influences.

Environmental factors, such as viral infections and exposure to certain medications, have been implicated as potential triggers for MG in genetically susceptible individuals. Infections caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have been associated with an increased risk of developing MG (Farmakidis et al., 2012). Additionally, certain medications, such as antibiotics (e.g., fluoroquinolones) and beta-blockers, have been reported to trigger MG or exacerbate existing symptoms.

Risk Factors

In addition to the genetic and environmental factors mentioned above, other risk factors for developing MG have been identified. Age and gender are significant factors, as MG commonly affects women under the age of 40 and men over the age of 60 (Farmakidis et al., 2012). Hormonal factors, including fluctuations in estrogen levels, may contribute to the gender disparity observed in MG incidence.

Furthermore, thymic abnormalities have been associated with MG, particularly thymomas (tumors of the thymus gland) and thymic hyperplasia (overgrowth of thymic tissue). The thymus plays a crucial role in the maturation of immune cells, and aberrations in its structure and function may contribute to the development of autoimmunity in MG.


The diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis involves a multidimensional approach, incorporating clinical evaluation, neurophysiological testing and serological assays. Clinical assessment begins with a thorough medical history and physical examination. Neurologists pay close attention to characteristic symptoms, such as fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability that worsen with activity and improve with rest.

Neurophysiological tests play a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis and assessing disease severity. Repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography are commonly used to evaluate the function and transmission of the neuromuscular junction. These tests can demonstrate abnormal decremental responses in nerve conduction and provide evidence of impaired neuromuscular transmission.

Serological testing complements the clinical and neurophysiological assessments by detecting autoantibodies associated with MG. The presence of autoantibodies against AChR or MuSK in the serum helps support the diagnosis, particularly in cases with atypical clinical presentations (Gilhus and Verschuuren, 2015). Serological testing also aids in differentiating MG from other
neuromuscular disorders with similar clinical features.


The treatment of Myasthenia Gravis aims to alleviate symptoms, improve muscle strength and reduce the frequency and severity of disease exacerbations. The approach to treatment often involves a combination of pharmacotherapy, immunomodulation and supportive measures.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as pyridostigmine, are commonly used as the first-line pharmacological treatment for MG. These medications enhance the availability of acetylcholine, the neurotransmitter responsible for nerve impulse transmission, thus improving neuromuscular transmission and temporarily relieving muscle weakness (Farmakidis et al., 2012).

Immunosuppressive agents are employed to suppress the abnormal immune response in MG. Corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are frequently used as long-term immunosuppressive therapy to reduce the production of autoantibodies and modulate the immune system’s activity. Other immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine, may be prescribed either as monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids to achieve optimal disease control (Farmakidis et al., 2012).

In severe cases or during disease exacerbations, plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy may be employed as short-term treatments. Plasmapheresis involves removing and filtering the patient’s blood to remove pathogenic autoantibodies and other immune factors. IVIg therapy provides high-dose immunoglobulins derived from pooled human plasma, which modulate the immune response and neutralize autoantibodies (Farmakidis et al., 2012).

Surgical interventions, such as thymectomy (removal of the thymus gland), are considered in certain cases, particularly when thymomas or thymic hyperplasia are present. Thymectomy can lead to clinical improvement and a reduction in the need for immunosuppressive medications (Farmakidis et al., 2012).

Current and Future Research

Current research on Myasthenia Gravis is focused on improving diagnostic methods, understanding disease mechanisms and developing more targeted and effective therapies. The identification of novel therapeutic targets is a key area of investigation. Tüzün and Christadoss (2013) highlight the potential of targeting B cells, T cells and regulatory T cells to modulate the immune response in MG. Developing therapies that specifically regulate these immune cell populations holds promise for achieving better disease control and minimizing side effects associated with broad immunosuppression.

Advancements in genetic and genomic research have identified potential genetic risk factors associated with MG susceptibility. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed several genetic variants associated with increased MG risk, shedding light on the molecular
pathways involved in disease pathogenesis. Future studies may uncover the complex interactions between genetic predisposition, environmental triggers and the immune system’s response, leading to personalized treatment approaches and targeted therapies.

Furthermore, epidemiological research plays a crucial role in understanding the global burden of MG and identifying geographical or demographic patterns. Carr et al. (2019) emphasize the importance of population-based studies to determine MG prevalence, incidence and associated factors. These studies contribute to better healthcare planning, resource allocation and the implementation of targeted interventions tailored to specific populations.


Myasthenia Gravis is a complex autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability due to disrupted neuromuscular transmission. While the exact cause of MG remains elusive, the production of autoantibodies targeting acetylcholine receptors or MuSK is a central pathological feature. The interplay between genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers and immune dysregulation contributes to disease development.

Current and future research efforts focus on identifying novel therapeutic targets, improving diagnostic methods, understanding disease mechanisms and exploring the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to MG susceptibility. Advances in these areas hold promise for personalized treatment approaches and improved management of Myasthenia Gravis, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for individuals living with this challenging condition.

  1. Carr AS, Cardwell CR, McCarron PO, McConville J. (2019). Epidemiology of Myasthenia Gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 52(4):161-173.
  2. Farmakidis C, Pasnoor M, Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ. (2012). Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis: an update. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 8(3):127-134.
  3. Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. (2015). Pathophysiology of Myasthenia Gravis: update on disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. European Journal of Neurology, 22(6): 927-935.
  4. Tüzün E, Christadoss P. (2013). Emerging therapeutic targets in Myasthenia Gravis. Autoimmunity Reviews, 12(9): 907-911.